it wa too long and too vegatabley and rabbity.

it was absolutely fantastic

I Think It Was Great But Not As Good As The Shorts

I can't believe you didn't think it was fantastic! There's no such thing as too long or too vegetabley or too rabbity!
lol well that's what i think but your free to your own opinion even if it's not that good...

Flushed Away,Rocked! WAAAAAAAAAAAYYYYYY better than that babyish COTWR! A toddler would be affraid,sure,but as far as I'm concerned,It was el,lameo.

I can't believe it, if you didn't like that EXCELLENT film, you must not be a true fan! Agreed with no1fan. I think it is a matter of opinion, but I took my little brother to see it, he wasn't one bit scared! He started shouting Hutch phrases! He's only 1 year old. And his first words were: Cheese, Gromit! Cute when he says that

i don't think it the best w&g film but its good and very clever

It is WELL the best W&G film! And Mibso, your little brothers first words were "Cheese Gromit!" God, how cute.

Flushed Away,Rocked! WAAAAAAAAAAAYYYYYY better than that babyish COTWR! A toddler would be affraid,sure,but as far as I'm concerned,It was el,lameo.

DO YOU NO HOW MANY PPL WORKED SOOOOOOO HARD TO DO THAT FILM AND ALL U CAN DO IS SAY IT'S RUBBISH???

dani nev bo, that wasnt very nicely put!!!

My whole family thought it was fabulous for a whole panoply of reasons, which is why we signed up on the web site. The sound track, the visual puns, the amazing coordination of movement... you forget it's animation! Always a little shock to see the models in the afterclips, because one forgets that they aren't in fact alive!

me too i thought it was fantastic, in fact the whole family have enjoyed all the films and hope they will produce many many more

Apart from there films being a visual feast with all the great detail, you cannot beat Aardmans brand of humour!

dani_nev_bo, although everyone is entitled to their opinion we'd appreciate it if you expressed it in a less-agressive manner. This is a friendly site - please mind your language.

Were rabbit wasn't meant to be scary. It was meant to funny, exiting, mysterious, have an interesting plot with lots of twists and turns and to have emotion and a man/giant rabbit and his dog.
and in that respects it was all I wanted and a gr8 film

flushed away caused aardman and dreamworks 2 split up so no that film was rubbish. yes curse of the were-rabbit was different because they wernt on the moon or in tecno trousers or solving a "sheep rustling" mystery. aardman wanted 2 bring cinematic quilty to our screens as they were making a film thats the length of all 3 films put together. wallace had been altered 2 as his face was shorter. this is why curse was different compared 2 the other 3

to sum it up curse was good and people who think it isnt need 2 respect it had to look advanced and perfessional as this adventure was taking place in the cinema

Were-rabbit isn't scarey and isn't supposed to be. Watch your language dani_nev_bo!!! COTWR wasn't babyish at all! In fact, when I went to see Curse of the Were-rabbit in a very large cinema in Glasgow, there were more adults than children! So mind what you say! Aardman have a great sense of cinematic quality AND TV things. They the multi-talented group of the world! GOOD OLD AARDMAN!!!

lol, sorry everyone, I am nown 2 hav a big opinion!!! I'd just like 2 apologise if I offended any1. Sorry jody, i no u r entitled 2 ur own opinion.

But springwizard, what u said wasnt very nice either, even tho u r entitled 2 ur own opinion it was a bit rude

Flushed away was like some writers trying to be like steve box, or Nick Park, David Sproxton, or peter Lord etc.
because they tried to make the humour british but they made it ignorant of other countries. Like & never say:
"hi we are are british and french find everyones pain funny and americans can't play football"
which I flushed away did and (even though I am british) thats just not funny.
Also flushed away was a gr8 story but well over half of the jokes were slap stick but wallace and gromit has verbal, visual, puns, sarcastic, what if, cheeky and topsy turvy jokes and many others.
plus they were plastercine
goooooooooooooo plastercine

Wow! I would copy and paste that but I definately won't. I wish I could though. I'll just say I agree with Dachappell in every word he said!

well said! i just dont even want to watch flushed away its just not the aardman film quality were used 2.No plasticine means that its not aardman. i hated the way that they copyed nicks idea of the wide mouths. they have no right!

I really have to say that i thought THE CURSE OF THE WERE-RABBIT was not that good the shorts were way beter. It was to big of a story it just didnt feel like a W&G i liked it when there where just three characters not fifty it was just to big!

it was brill but not as good as the shorts but still brill

coooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooool

i love the curse of the were rabbit.